Coal’s perfect storm hits $70 billion Australian projects

«If you’re building a coal mine and you need to find third parties (to buy the coal), it may not necessarily be so easy, so you’re not going to tip in billions of dollars.»

Of all the shocks to hit the industry, it was perhaps Justice Brian Preston’s ruling in a Sydney court room on February 8 that has the farthest-reaching consequences.

Loading

Industry alarm

Gloucester Resources’ Rocky Hill coal mine proposal had already been rejected by the New South Wales government due to its potential adverse impact on the local environment and community, but Preston went a step further in throwing out Gloucester’s appeal, saying it would add to greenhouse gas emissions at a time when rapid and deep cuts were needed.

The minerals lobby reacted with particular alarm to Preston’s judgement that Scope 3 emissions — which encompass the carbon impact from end-users burning the coal — were relevant.

The decision would «reverberate across the economy,» Minerals Council CEO Tania Constable said.

The ruling has persuasive power, said Rosemary Lyster, Professor of Climate and Environment Law at the Sydney Law School, part of the University of Sydney.

Still, it doesn’t set a binding precedent as it was based on a merits appeal, she said, which doesn’t review the legality of an earlier decision.

«If other cases come before the same tribunal to challenge a decision to allow or not allow a coal mine by way of a merits appeal, the reasoning could go the same way,» she said. It could also influence other tribunals or courts in the future, Lyster added.

BHP Group’s CEO Andrew Mackenzie said it was a «strange» notion that Australia could manage climate change by stopping coal production, referring to the Rocky Hill decision.

Potential hurdles

Among the developers wary of the ruling is Whitehaven Coal, which is currently going through the approvals process for its $700 million Vickery expansion project. Whitehaven Chief Executive Paul Flynn told investors in February the ruling was «unhelpful,» but did not necessarily have any implications for Vickery.

There are some $70 billion of new coal projects in the pipeline, according to government estimates.

There are some $70 billion of new coal projects in the pipeline, according to government estimates.Credit:Bloomberg

Other projects that might fall under the spotlight include the Glencore-led United Wambo, which plans to develop an open-cut mine producing up to 10 million tonnes per annum in the Hunter Valley. The Swiss company bowed to investor pressure when it pledged last week to limit coal production and align the business with Paris climate targets.

That move underlined the pressure producers are under from investors to make climate change an integral part of their business planning.

Tougher environmental mandates mean fund fund managers are increasingly steering clear of coal, while Japanese industrial giants Mitsubishi, Mitsui  and Itochu Corp. are all pulling back from the sector.

Unwitting victim

Coal may also be an unwitting victim of trade tensions between Australia and China with the Asian nation jamming up imports of coal from Australia, with at least one major port suspending customs clearance.

Coal-loving Resources Minister Matt Canavan is undeterred by recent events, saying he wants the nation to dominate the coal market.

Fat Prophet’s Lennox also warns against getting overly bearish on the fuel.

While growth in gas, hydro and renewable power generation is set to eclipse coal globally, it will continue to be an important feedstock to meet the energy needs of a fast-growing world population, he reckons.

Bloomberg

Most Viewed in Business

Loading

Источник: Theage.com.au

Источник: Corruptioner.life

Share

You may also like...